President Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBB) of 2025 materially changed multiple tax and policy provisions with a direct impact on tech startups and investors. This article examines how these changes impact everything from tax benefits to international partnerships, and provides strategies for tech companies to thrive amid new compliance requirements.
Table of Contents
- Major expansion of QSBS benefits for founders and investors
- Restored R&D tax benefits for tech innovation
- AI regulation framework takes a new direction
- Foreign entity restrictions reshape global tech partnerships
- Impact on sector-specific tech opportunities
- Strategic tax planning for tech entrepreneurs
- M&A and investment implications for venture-backed companies
- Long-term shifts in the venture ecosystem
- Navigating the new venture tech landscape
Major expansion of QSBS benefits for founders and investors
The One Big Beautiful Bill redefines the Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) exclusion program through a series of founder and investor-friendly reforms. Instead of waiting five years for any tax benefit, tech entrepreneurs can now access a tiered schedule of exclusions starting at the three-year mark.
Here is where things get interesting for founders: after holding stock for just three years, they can exclude 50% of their gains. At four years, that jumps to 75%. The full 100% exclusion still kicks in at five years, but having earlier options creates far more flexibility around exit timing.
Perhaps even more significantly, the bill raises the federal tax-free cap from $10 million to $15 million per taxpayer. For successful founders and early investors, this $5 million increase represents substantial additional tax savings. The qualification threshold for startups also expands from $50 million to $75 million in assets, allowing more growth-stage companies to maintain QSBS eligibility for their shareholders.
These gains will not remain static. The exclusion cap and startup valuation threshold will adjust annually for inflation starting in 2027. This built-in scalability means the program’s benefits remain meaningful (and predictable) even as the venture ecosystem evolves. For many an industry insider, these expanded QSBS provisions are the most founder-friendly tax change since the QSBS provision was first introduced.
Restored R&D tax benefits for tech innovation
After years of advocacy from the tech sector, the bill finally reverses course on R&D tax treatment. Starting in 2025, companies can once again immediately expense their domestic research and development costs rather than amortizing them over five years.
In one impactful provision for established tech companies, the OBBB allows for the acceleration of previously amortized R&D expenses from 2022-2024. This creates an immediate tax benefit for businesses that had been forced to spread these deductions over time. The bill maintains a stark contrast between domestic and foreign research. While U.S.-based research and development gets immediate expensing, overseas development costs still face 15-year amortization.
This domestic-foreign disparity carries special weight for early-stage startups, where research investments often dwarf revenue in the critical first years.
The restored immediate expensing delivers important tax relief when young companies need it most, potentially influencing where the next generation of tech innovation takes place.
AI regulation framework takes a new direction
In a last-minute change to the bill that caught many tech industry leaders off guard, the final bill excluded the 10-year moratorium on state AI regulation. This omission crystallizes an uneven regulatory landscape that artificial intelligence companies must navigate.
Without federal preemption, states retain full authority to regulate AI technologies as they see fit. We are likely to see a complex patchwork of state-level rules emerge around contentious issues like deepfakes, facial recognition, algorithmic transparency, and automated decision-making.
Some states may implement strict oversight while others maintain a lighter touch, creating a challenging compliance environment for AI startups.
The implications go far beyond regulatory compliance. AI companies must now design their products and services for state-by-state adaptability. Rather than building to a single set of federal standards, they will need flexible product configurations to accommodate any requirement across any jurisdiction—even contradictory standards.
Being forced to adhere to fragmented legislative guidelines is a significant, resource-heavy undertaking—one that could slow the pace of AI innovation. New start-ups (still developing AI governance frameworks) will be especially disadvantaged.
Foreign entity restrictions reshape global tech partnerships
Protectionist language is central to the “One, Big, Beautiful Bill” (OBBB). The OBBB outlines stringent new rules around “prohibited foreign entities” (PFEs), primarily targeting organizations with ties to China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. For tech startups with international ties—particularly in ownership, supply chain, or development—these provisions bring immediate compliance challenges.
Beyond direct ownership, the bill casts a wide net, applying to:
- Debt arrangements
- Licensing and IP agreements
- Contracts that may allow foreign influence, even indirectly (Incredibly vague and subject to wild interpretations)
Startups with global value chains or overseas development teams must now conduct deep due diligence to identify potential PFE exposure. For many, unwinding any China-linked components or partnerships may prove extraordinarily complex.
Even companies without foreign ownership concerns face red tape. The bill’s certification requirements demand that firms and their suppliers (and sub-tier suppliers) affirm the absence of PFE involvement to remain eligible for key federal tax benefits.
For venture-backed startups, this may necessitate a careful reexamination of cap tables, investor affiliations, and partner relationships. Founders could face a binary choice: limit foreign entanglements or risk ineligibility for domestic incentives like bonus depreciation, opportunity zone benefits, or green energy credits.
Impact on sector-specific tech opportunities
The legislation’s trillion-dollar reduction in Medicaid funding over the next decade is sending shockwaves through the healthtech sector. Well-funded startups like Cityblock Health, with its $886 million in venture backing, and Unite Us, having raised $241 million, face an urgent need to diversify beyond their Medicaid-centric business models.
In the cleantech arena, green tech companies were dealt an existential gut punch. The elimination of household tax credits for solar installations, electric vehicle (EV) subsidies, and other incentives forces these companies to fundamentally rethink their go-to-market strategies.
Additionally, the removal of consumer incentives could significantly lower adoption rates for EVs and other clean-energy technologies.
Despite these challenges, new opportunities still exist. Healthcare providers are facing tighter budgets, increased regulatory requirements, and staffing shortages. The industry desperately needs automation (and the start-ups to develop them) to overcome these setbacks.
Strategic tax planning for tech entrepreneurs
The expanded QSBS benefits create compelling reasons for founders to consider restructuring their company. When raising capital, entrepreneurs should pay particular attention to maintaining C-Corporation status, documenting qualified business activities, and maximizing future tax advantages.
Nailing the timing is critical under the new tiered exclusion schedule. Instead of automatically holding until the five-year mark, founders approaching potential exits should evaluate whether capturing a partial exclusion at three or four years might better serve their overall objectives.
Over the long term, these enhanced benefits may fundamentally shift how tech companies approach their corporate structure decisions. The traditional debate between C-Corps and LLCs takes on an entirely new dimension when considering the potential for millions in additional tax savings through QSBS eligibility.
Tax advisors can help businesses make the most of these OBBB conundrums, developing comprehensive strategies to extract the bill’s full tax advantages.
M&A and investment implications for venture-backed companies
The newly enhanced QSBS provisions offer powerful incentives for M&A activity—especially for mid-market deals (e.g., $50-$100 million range). By significantly boosting after-tax returns, these benefits are expected to drive increased acquisition interest in qualifying startups.
Venture capital fund managers can opt for shorter-term commitments. The traditional model of holding companies for 5+ years may give way to approaches that capitalize on the three-year, four-year, and partial exclusion thresholds. This shake-up could mean more frequent, smaller exits rather than fewer, larger ones.
For VCs balancing domestic tax advantages with international investment, the path forward is much murkier. Pre-transaction due diligence becomes even more critical to ensure PFE restrictions do not derail deals or compromise funding eligibility. Some startups may need to implement sophisticated corporate structures that cleanly separate domestic and international operations.
Effectively, the legislation creates two parallel tracks for VCs. One track is optimized for domestic operations and tax benefits, while the other is structured for maximum international flexibility. Successfully straddling both worlds will require sophisticated legal and tax planning.
Long-term shifts in the venture ecosystem
By and large, the “One, Big, Beautiful Bill” (OBBB) pushes the venture capital ecosystem toward a domestically-oriented future. With protectionist aims (shoring up U.S. jobs), the bill “encourages” companies to divest international foreign value-chain dependencies.
Companies with U.S.-focused operations (or limited international dependencies) stand to capture the bill’s greatest benefits.
The protectionist aims are even impacting university endowments and the domestic labor market’s talent pool. The OBBB increases the tax burden of university endowments. With some institutions staring down the barrel at a 471.4% tax hike on investment returns (with tax rates going from flat 1.4% to a maximum 8%), universities will have limited funds to invest in tech companies.
Navigating the new venture tech landscape
The “One, Big, Beautiful Bill” is a complex web of obligations, tax benefits, investment opportunities, and “polite” demands that require a sophisticated yet nuanced approach.
Tech entrepreneurs and investors need experienced advisors who understand both the bill’s broad implications and its VC-specific intricacies.
Unlock the full potential of your financial future with Harness today. Our expert team is here to help you journey through the complexities of the bill, making sure you grasp its implications for your financial landscape. Together, we will craft a robust strategy that not only adapts to the challenges of this sector but also empowers you to thrive in it.
Disclaimer:
Tax related products and services provided through Harness Tax LLC. Harness Tax LLC is affiliated with Harness Wealth Advisers LLC, collectively referred to as “Harness Wealth”. Harness Wealth Advisers LLC is a paid promoter, internet registered investment adviser. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. This article should not be considered tax or legal advice and is provided for informational purposes only. Please consult a tax and/or legal professional for advice specific to your individual circumstances. This article is a product of Harness Tax LLC.
Content was prepared by a third-party provider and not the adviser. Content should not be regarded as a complete analysis of the subjects discussed. Although we believe the content is reliable, it is not guaranteed as to accuracy and does not purport to be complete nor is it intended to be the primary basis for financial or tax decisions.