When it comes to business succession planning, buy-sell agreements determine how an owner’s interest will be bought or sold upon specific triggering events like death, disability, or retirement, ensuring business continuity and a clear exit strategy. While these agreements may seem straightforward, they conceal complex tax implications that can take even seasoned business owners by surprise, triggering a cascade of tax consequences.
In this article, we’ll examine buy-sell agreements, the key distinctions between purchase structures, how different business entities impact overall tax liability, and how platforms like Harness can help tax advisors manage these agreements more tax efficiently.
Table of Contents
- Understanding the tax framework of buy-sell agreements
- Tax risks in entity purchase agreements
- Understanding cross-purchase vs entity purchase agreements
- Funding mechanisms and their tax implications
- Valuation methods and their tax consequences
- Special tax considerations for different business entities
- Structuring agreements to minimize tax liability
- How Harness can help
Key takeaways
- Post-Connelly ruling, if a business uses life insurance to fund a buy-sell agreement, the insurance proceeds might be included in the business’s valuation, leading to unexpected estate tax liabilities.
- Cross-purchase structures offer better tax treatment through beneficial basis step-ups while avoiding corporate-level complications.
- Regular independent valuations strengthen agreements against IRS challenges and prevent mismatches between insurance proceeds and business value.
- The choice of business entity can profoundly affect tax outcomes. For example, S corporations must protect their election status, while C corporations face potential double taxation.
Understanding the tax framework of buy-sell agreements
The moment a buy-sell agreement kicks in, it sets off a chain reaction of tax considerations, from income tax and capital gains to estate tax and basis adjustments. Unfortunately, many business owners don’t discover these tax implications until it’s too late to restructure their agreements.
In recent years, the IRS has intensified its scrutiny of these arrangements, particularly when life insurance policies fund the purchase of deceased owners’ interests. With tax advisors tending to focus solely on immediate operational concerns when structuring these agreements, they are inadvertently creating tax crises further down the line. What’s needed are buy-sell agreements that balance current operational needs with long-term tax efficiency.
Tax risks in entity purchase agreements
With the field of buy-sell agreements, entity purchase agreements present particular tax complications, as illustrated in the recent Connelly v. United States case. When a company receives life insurance proceeds to fund a redemption, the IRS may include those proceeds in the business valuation for estate tax purposes – effectively taxing money that is already earmarked for buying out the deceased owner’s shares.
That’s often just the beginning of potential problems, however. Surviving shareholders typically receive no step-up in basis under entity purchase structures. This seemingly technical detail can result in substantially larger capital gains tax bills when they eventually sell their interests – a delayed and often hugely costly tax event that many owners never see coming.
The IRS keeps a watchful eye on accumulated earnings, also. If they determine a company is holding excessive cash for future redemptions, they might impose additional taxes. Even worse, what business owners intend as a capital transaction might be recharacterized as a dividend distribution, dramatically altering the tax consequences for departing shareholders.
A single misstep in structuring an entity purchase agreement can result in multiple tax complications. Tax advisors need to carefully weigh these risks against any operational advantages the entity purchase structure might offer.
Understanding cross-purchase vs entity purchase agreements
Cross-purchase agreements are often seen as the tax-advantaged alternative to entity purchase structures. When surviving shareholders purchase a deceased owner’s interest directly, they typically receive a beneficial step-up in basis – a key advantage that can substantially reduce future capital gains tax liability.
Insurance proceeds in cross-purchase arrangements flow directly to individual shareholders, neatly sidestepping the corporate-level tax complications that plague entity purchase structures.
While this may be a cleaner approach from a tax perspective,cross-purchase arrangements come with their own set of challenges. With multiple owners, for example, he administrative burden increases exponentially. Each shareholder must maintain separate policies on every other owner. In a business with just five shareholders, that means twenty separate policies to manage and fund.
The situation becomes even more complex when there are significant disparities in ownership percentages or owner demographics. Junior or minority partners might struggle to afford premiums on policies covering senior owners, potentially requiring taxable bonuses to cover the cost. This creates a secondary tax issue that needs careful management.
Funding mechanisms and their tax implications
Life insurance may remain the standard way to fund buy-sell agreements, however, premium payments create their own tax complications. The identity of the premium payer matters a great deal. For example, when a company pays premiums for cross-purchase agreements, shareholders may face phantom income without seeing any actual cash.
In cross-purchase arrangements where the company pays premiums on behalf of shareholders, these payments must be carefully defined. Are they compensation or are they dividends? The wrong classification can trigger unexpected tax consequences or even invite IRS scrutiny of the entire arrangement.
The transfer-for-value rule lurks as a particularly nasty trap. This seemingly obscure provision can transform tax-free insurance proceeds into taxable income when policies change hands between owners. It is a rule that is easily triggered during routine business reorganizations or when adjusting buy-sell arrangements.
Alternative funding mechanisms like installment sales come with their own tax problems. Questions about interest deductibility arise, and the IRS may impose imputed interest adjustments that create taxable income where none was intended.
Are buy-sell agreements tax-deductible?
Generally, premiums paid for life insurance policies funding buy-sell agreements are not tax-deductible. However, certain legal and professional fees incurred for drafting or structuring the agreement itself may be deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses.
Valuation methods and their tax consequences
Formula-based valuations, while administratively convenient, often create a dangerous gap between the IRS’s view of business value for estate tax purposes and the actual transaction price specified in the agreement. This discrepancy can lead to the worst possible outcome: heirs paying estate taxes on value they never receive.
Regular independent business valuations provide far stronger protection against IRS challenges than fixed price or formula approaches. But even with professional valuations, the agreement must address practical realities: What happens when insurance proceeds do not match the business value? How are shortfalls funded? What are the tax implications of retained surpluses?
The chosen valuation method directly impacts surviving owners’ tax basis, creating ripple effects that may not surface for years. A valuation that seems reasonable today could create major tax difficulties when owners eventually sell their interests.
Special tax considerations for different business entities
S corporations walk a particularly narrow path with buy-sell agreements. A poorly structured redemption can inadvertently create a second class of stock, threatening the company’s S election status. Once lost, this valuable tax status can be extraordinarily difficult to regain.
Pass-through entities offer unique opportunities for basis adjustments that can significantly impact tax efficiency. However, these mechanisms work differently for partnerships, S corporations, and LLCs. What works well for one entity type might create tax disasters for another.
C corporations often face the worst tax outcomes with entity purchase agreements. The combination of double taxation, the absence of basis step-up benefits, and the absence of basis step-up benefits can create extremely high tax bills.
Despite all this, many tax advisors continue applying one-size-fits-all solutions without considering entity-specific tax attributes.
Structuring agreements to minimize tax liability
Smart tax planning starts with analyzing whether substantial life insurance proceeds might trigger alternative minimum tax obligations. It’s a consideration that’s often overlooked until it’s too late to restructure the agreement.
Timing matters enormously in buy-sell transactions. Properly structured waiting periods between funding and purchase can help prevent the IRS from including insurance proceeds in business valuations. In addition to this, the specific timing of transactions relative to tax years can dramatically impact overall tax liability for all parties involved.
Every trigger event – death, disability, retirement – must align perfectly with the funding mechanism’s payout terms. When misalignment occurs, it can result in tax issues alongside potential legal complications and may invalidate key tax planning provisions.
Pre-existing shareholder agreements can torpedo even the most carefully crafted buy-sell tax provisions. Since shareholder agreements legally supersede buy-sell arrangements, tax advisors must ensure perfect harmony between these documents or risk seeing their tax planning collapse when it matters most.
How Harness can help
Effectively managing the complex tax implications of buy-sell agreements often requires specialist expertise. At Harness, our community of tax professionals serves as an ongoing source of specialized legal and financial knowledge. This network allows advisors to connect with peers and experts who possess an in-depth understanding of buy-sell agreement tax optimization.
Tapping into this community, tax advisors can gain fresh perspectives, share best practices, and collaborate on solutions for even the most challenging client scenarios.
Get started with Harness and join a community of tax professionals that can help your tax practice perform better.
Disclaimer:
Tax-related products and services provided through Harness Tax LLC. Harness Tax LLC is affiliated with Harness Wealth Advisers LLC, collectively referred to as “Harness Wealth”. Harness Wealth Advisers LLC is a paid promoter, internet registered investment adviser. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. This article should not be considered tax or legal advice and is provided for informational purposes only. Please consult a tax and/or legal professional for advice specific to your individual circumstances. This article is a product of Harness Tax LLC.
Content was prepared by a third-party provider and not the adviser. Content should not be regarded as a complete analysis of the subjects discussed. Although we believe the content is reliable, it is not guaranteed as to accuracy and does not purport to be complete nor is it intended to be the primary basis for financial or tax decisions.